By: @piyushwtf

In the vibrant world of music reality shows, contestants vie for the spotlight, dreaming of fame, success, and the chance to share their art with the world. However, behind the glitz and glamour lies a reality that often goes unnoticed—the struggles faced by contestants once the show ends. Recently, discussions have emerged regarding the absence of music releases from contestants of one of the country’s most prominent music shows, Hustle 3.0. So, what’s the reason behind this silence?

According to insights shared in online forums, contestants of Hustle 3.0 are bound by contractual agreements with T-Series, a major player in the Indian music industry. These contracts, described as artist deals rather than simple song deals, come with stringent terms and conditions, limiting contestants’ ability to release music independently.

The crux of the issue lies in the nature of these contracts. Contestants are reportedly required to fulfill specific quotas of track releases within designated time frames. Furthermore, the label retains the authority to determine whether the music meets their standards for release. This effectively means that contestants are bound to T-Series until they fulfill these contractual obligations, even if it means waiting years before they can release music independently.

One forum user highlighted the predicament faced by these contestants, noting that they are essentially “serving their term” until T-Series deems their music suitable for release. This contractual entanglement has led to frustration among contestants and fans alike, with many questioning the fairness of such agreements.

The length of these contracts has also sparked concern, with one user revealing that some contestants could be tied to the label for up to nine years. While there may be provisions for early termination, auto-renewal clauses complicate matters, leaving contestants in a contractual deadlock.

This situation underscores the complexities of the music industry, where success on a reality show does not always translate into a flourishing music career. It raises questions about the balance of power between artists and labels, as well as the need for greater transparency and fairness in contractual agreements.

In conclusion, the silence surrounding the music releases of Hustle 3.0 contestants sheds light on the harsh realities of the music industry. Aspiring artists must navigate a landscape fraught with contractual obligations, industry politics, and the ever-present pressure to deliver commercial success. It serves as a stark reminder of the importance of understanding the terms of any contract they sign and advocating for greater equity in the industry.